Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ali Amiri; Aziz Goshaderoo; Pantea Moradinejad; Mohammad Shokri Vahed; Fan Qi

doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

2022, Vol: 13, Issue: 3

13/3Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Cover Letter
Title Page

« Previous Article

Review Article

J Complement Med Res. 2022; 13(3): 109-113

doi: 10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ali Amiri, Aziz Goshaderoo, Pantea Moradinejad, Mohammad Shokri Vahed, Fan Qi.

Abstract
Objective: In the esthetic area, immediate implant placement are a great opportunity in modern dentistry. Nevertheless, the outcome was impacted by numerous surgical and prosthetic components. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate immediate implant failure and changes between the regenerative procedure and control groups.
Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ISI, and Google scholar have been utilized as the electronic databases for performing a systematic literature review between 2010 to March 2021. The quality of the involved studies has been evaluated using the Cochrane tool and assessed by two reviewers. The current systematic review has been carried out with regard to the key consideration of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The mean difference was used for changes in the crestal bone between baseline and follow-up. Risk ratio with the 95% confidence interval (CI) used for implant failure between test and control groups.
Results: 126 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were found during the electronic search. Finally, four publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria required for this systematic review. The Mean difference of changes in the crestal bone between test and control groups of immediate implant placement was 0.62mm (95% CI: 0.31mm, 0.94mm; P=0.00) and heterogeneity found (I2 = 80.43%; P =0.00).
Conclusions: The immediately placed implants with regenerative procedure versus the control group showed the better performance to the changes in the crestal bone.

Key words: Alveolar Bone Grafting, Dental Implantation, Dental Prosthesis

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Ali Amiri Articles by Aziz Goshaderoo Articles by Pantea Moradinejad Articles by Mohammad Shokri Vahed Articles by Fan Qi
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

Amiri A, Goshaderoo A, Moradinejad P, Vahed MS, Qi F. Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Complement Med Res. 2022; 13(3): 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Web Style

Amiri A, Goshaderoo A, Moradinejad P, Vahed MS, Qi F. Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://www.jocmr.com/?mno=103152 [Access: August 07, 2022]. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Amiri A, Goshaderoo A, Moradinejad P, Vahed MS, Qi F. Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Complement Med Res. 2022; 13(3): 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Amiri A, Goshaderoo A, Moradinejad P, Vahed MS, Qi F. Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Complement Med Res. (2022), [cited August 07, 2022]; 13(3): 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Harvard Style

Amiri, A., Goshaderoo, . A., Moradinejad, . P., Vahed, . M. S. & Qi, . F. (2022) Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Complement Med Res, 13 (3), 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Turabian Style

Amiri, Ali, Aziz Goshaderoo, Pantea Moradinejad, Mohammad Shokri Vahed, and Fan Qi. 2022. Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 13 (3), 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

Chicago Style

Amiri, Ali, Aziz Goshaderoo, Pantea Moradinejad, Mohammad Shokri Vahed, and Fan Qi. "Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 13 (2022), 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Amiri, A., Goshaderoo, . A., Moradinejad, . P., Vahed, . M. S. & Qi, . F. (2022) Implant Failure and Changes Between Regenerative Procedure Group and Control Group: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Complementary Medicine Research, 13 (3), 109-113. doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.03.24



Copyright � 2022 Journal of Complementary Medicine Research All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Complementary Medicine Research. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information Journal of Complementary Medicine Research Hosted by Ejmanager C/O Sukasiree Publication, 3990 Hillsboro Pike, Suite 330 Nashville,USA Email : editorjocmr@gmail.com

Contact Information

How to cite this article